Skip header and navigation and go directly to page content.

Charlie Stanier

Photo of Charlie StanierAssistant Professor (2004)
Assistant Research Engineer (2004)
IIHR-Hydroscience and Engineering
B.S., Princeton University
M.S., Johns Hopkins University
Ph.D., Carnegie Mellon University
Licensed Professional Engineer (Maryland, 1999)
319/335-1399; fax: 319/335-1415
charles-stanier@uiowa.edu

Research Group Home:

http://www.engineering.uiowa.edu/~cs_proj/index.htm

 

Research Interests:
Laboratory investigation and field sampling of air pollution, particularly of aerosol particles. Computation simulations to elucidate questions of atmospheric, aerosol chemistry, and the health effects of airborne contaminants. Some ongoing projects are described below.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Understanding the Chemistry, Meteorology, and Effects of Atmospheric New Particle Formation
The creation of new particles from gas-to-particle partitioning, or aerosol homogeneous nucleation, is a critical atmospheric process. Together with other key processes (primary particle emission, coagulation, deposition, and scavenging), nucleation maintains the number concentration of particles around the globe. Of these, nucleation is the least understood. Nucleation is known to occur when supersaturated gases form stable condensed phase clusters, thought to be in the nanometer size range, and then grow to sizes that are detectable by current instrumentation (~3 nm). Since nucleation competes with condensation to transfer material from the gas phase, nucleation is favored under clean conditions where there is limited surface area for condensation.
However, many recent studies at have observed new particle formation in more polluted sites than expected and this phenomenon has not been successfully included in air quality models. My research interest in this area is to test and refine our current conceptual model of new particle formation over North America by combining model-based predictions with physical and chemical field measurements.

Organics Aerosols: Field Sampling and Laboratory Characterization of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Formation
In many locations around the globe, carbonaceous materials make up a large fraction of the fine aerosol mass. Much of this carbonaceous material was originally emitted in the gas phase and later made its way to the aerosol phase via a combination of chemical reaction and adsorption/absorption. The underlying surface that forms the target or core for condensation of carbonaceous materials has an influence on the properties and formation of the condensed phase. It is our group’s interest to devise novel experimental techniques to characterize and understand these surface-semivolatile interactions and therefore improve models that rely on aerosol chemistry (climate and regional haze models).
We also seek to develop and deploy sampling techniques, analytical methods, and computational models to characterize the organic fraction of the aerosol not in terms of traditional metrics (e.g. organic aerosol mass, molecular makeup by gas chromatography), but in terms of metrics that are useful to understanding the health and climate effects of the organic aerosol (optical properties, role as surfactants, degree of polymerization, volatility, concentrations of biomolecules such as carbohydrates, proteins, allergens, and humic-like substances, hygroscopicity, and toxicity).

Quantifying and Managing Source-Receptor Relationships for Ultrafine and Nanoscale Materials
Air pollution and atmospheric particles have long been known to cause adverse health effects for short-term exposures. In the past 3 decades, there has been a growing consensus that air pollution is a serious chronic health problem in many areas of the globe – from polluted developed cities such as Los Angeles, to moderately polluted regions such as the Northeast U.S., to rapidly growing Megacities throughout Asia, Africa, and the Americas.
One intriguing hypothesis is that some ultrafine aerosols have particularly serious health consequences (the evidence is most convincing for diesel particulates). Just as scientists, doctors, and engineers begin to figure out the health consequences of current levels of ultrafine pollution, environmental concentrations of ultrafine and nanoscale material may change due to changes in economic activity, air pollution regulations, and developments in combustion, transport, and energy technologies. Examples of these drivers include changes in fuel sulfur content for diesel engines, the Clean Air Act and Clear Skies Initiatives to reduce fine particulate mass, and the use of particulate filters in diesel engines. As an additional uncertainty in the ultrafine health effects problem, manufactured nanomaterials are expected to growth several-fold in the near future. These materials may (or may not) have sufficient toxicity and environmental mobility to “leak” into the environment in cause adverse health and/or ecological effects.

My research goal is support society’s efforts to understand and manage these potential health effects by constructing computational source-receptor and exposure models for ultrafine aerosols and nanoscale materials. This will be extensively supported by field measurements, and used for the prediction of human exposures and their changes due to changes in precursor emissions, combustion technologies, and the growth of nanomaterial use.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Recent Publications

 

Lewandowski, P.A., Eichinger, W.E., Prueger, J.H., Stanier, C.O., and Hatfield, J.L.  Lidar Approach in Estimating Particulate Mass Emissions from a Poultry Production Facility.  Submitted Sept 2009 to the Journal of Environmental Quality.

 

Pettibone, A., W. Eichinger, and C.O. Stanier.  Number-Based Emission Factors and Ultrafine Particle Events in Mexico City, in preparation.

 

Navea, J., Young, M., Xu, S., Stanier, C.O., Grassian, V.  Heterogeneous Photolytic Oxidation of Cyclic Methylsiloxanes: Heterogeneous Uptake of Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) and Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) on Components of Reactive Dust Aerosol in the Presence of Simulated Sunlight.

 

Pettibone, A., A. Andrews, W. Eichinger, K. Davis, L. Diaz and C.O. Stanier (2009), West Branch, Iowa: A New Site for Boundary Layer--New Particle Formation Study, in preparation.

 

Navea, J., Stanier, C.O., Young, M., Xu, S., Stanier, C.O., Grassian, V. Sensitivity of Atmospheric Lifetime of cVMS to Release Pattern, Spatial Gradients in OH, and Heterogeneous Reactions.

 

Navea, J., Xu, S.H., Stanier, C.O., Young, M.A., Grassian, V.  Heterogeneous uptake of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D-4) and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D-5) onto mineral dust aerosol under variable RH conditions.  Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 43:26, pp. 4060-4069. 

 

Navea, J., Young, M., Xu, S., Stanier, C.O., Grassian, V.  Effect of Ozone and Relative Humidity on the Heterogeneous Uptake of Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane and Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane on Model Mineral Dust Aerosol Components. Journal of Physical Chemistry A.  Vol 113:24, pp. 7030-7038. 

 

Stanier, C.O.; Donahue, N.M.; and Pandis, S.N.  “Parameterization of Secondary Organic Aerosol Mass Fractions from Smog Chamber Data”, 2008, Atmos. Environ. 42, 2276-2299.

 

Campbell, J.E., Carmichael, G.R., Chai, T., Mena-Carrasco, M., Tang, Y., Blake, D.R., Blake, N.J., Vay, S.A., Collatz, G.J., Baker, I., Berry, J.A., Montzka, S.A., Sweeney, C., Schnoor, J.L., Stanier, C.O.  “Photosynthetic Control of Atmospheric Carbonyl Sulfide During the Growing Season.”  Science,  Vol. 322, 2008, pp. 1085-1088.

 

Pathak, Ravi K., Stanier, C.O., Donahue, N.M., and Pandis, S.N.  “Ozonolysis of α-pinene at atmospherically relevant concentrations: Temperature dependence of aerosol mass fractions (yields)”, 2007, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D03201, doi:10.1029/2006JD007436.

 

Campbell, J. E., Carmichael, G. R., Tang, Y., Chai, T., Vay, S. A., Choi, Y.-H., Sachse, G. W., Singh, H. B., Schnoor, J. L., Woo, J., Vukovich, J.M., Streets, D.G., Huey, L.G., Stanier, C.O.  “Analysis of Anthropogenic CO2 Signal in ICARTT Observations Using a Regional Chemical Transport Model and Observed Tracers”, 2007, Tellus B. 59B, 2, pp. 199-210.

 

Stanier, C., Pathak, R., and Pandis, S.N., “Measurements of the Volatility of Aerosols from α-Pinene Ozonolysis”, 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 2756-2763. 

NOTE: listed as a “Hot Article” by Thompson ISI for January 2008 (ranked 7th in hot article list for Environ. Sci. Technol.;  listed as an ACS “most-cited articles published in 2007”, #17 for ES&T in 2007 http://pubs.acs.org/journals/esthag/promo/most/most_cited/2007.html).

 

Pathak, R.K.; Presto, A.; Lane, T.; Stanier, C.O.; Donahue, N.M.; and Pandis, S.N. “Ozonolysis of α-pinene: Parameterization of Secondary Organic Aerosol Mass Fraction”, 2007, Atmos. Chem. Phys.7, 3811-3821.

 

Donahue, N.M., Robinson, A.L., Stanier, C.O., and Pandis, S.N., “The Coupled Partitioning, Dilution and Chemical Aging of Semivolatile Organics”, Environmental Science and Technology, Vol 40, 2006, 2635-2643.

 

Shrivastava, M., Lipsky, E., Stanier, C.O., and Robinson, A.L., “Modeling Semi-Volatile Organic Aerosol Mass Emissions from Combustion Systems”, Environmental Science and Technology, Vol 40, 2006, pp. 2671-2677.

 

Stanier, C.O., Solomon, P.A.  “Preface to the special section on Particulate Matter Supersites Program and Related Studies”, Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 2006, 111, doi:10.1029/2006JD007381. (see footnote regarding this article) NOTE: While technically “peer-reviewed” because of JGR Atmosphere’s policies, the article “Preface to the special section …” is not a technical article.  It is only 2 pages long, and is an introduction to the special issue, written by Solomon and me because of our positions as guest editors to the special edition.

 

Navea, J., Xu, S.H., Stanier, C.O., Young, M.A., Grassian, V.  Heterogeneous uptake of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D-4) and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D-5) onto mineral dust aerosol under variable RH conditions.  Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 43:26, pp. 4060-4069. 

 

Navea, J., Young, M., Xu, S., Stanier, C.O., Grassian, V.  Effect of Ozone and Relative Humidity on the Heterogeneous Uptake of Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane and Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane on Model Mineral Dust Aerosol Components. Journal of Physical Chemistry A.  Vol 113:24, pp. 7030-7038. 

 

Navea, J., Xu, S.H., Stanier, C.O., Young, M.A., Grassian, V.  Heterogeneous uptake of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D-4) and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D-5) onto mineral dust aerosol under variable RH conditions.  Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 43:26, pp. 4060-4069. 

 

Navea, J., Young, M., Xu, S., Stanier, C.O., Grassian, V.  Effect of Ozone and Relative Humidity on the Heterogeneous Uptake of Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane and Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane on Model Mineral Dust Aerosol Components. Journal of Physical Chemistry A.  Vol 113:24, pp. 7030-7038. 

 

Millet, D.B., Donahue, N.M., Pandis, S.N., Polidori, A., Stanier, C.O., Turpin, B.J., Goldstein, A.H., “Atmospheric volatile compound measurement during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: Results, interpretations, and quantification of primary and secondary contributions”, Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, Vol 110(D07S07), 2005, doi:10.1029/2004JD004601.

 

Zhou, L., Hopke, P.K., Stanier, C., Pandis, S.N., Ondov, J.M., and Pancras, P., “Investigation of the relationship between chemical composition and size distribution of airborne particles by Partial Least Squares (PLS) and Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF)”, Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, Vol. 110(D07S18), 2005, doi:10.1029/2004JD005050.     

 

Gaydos, T.M., Stanier, C.O., and Pandis, S.N., “Modeling of in-situ ultrafine atmospheric particle formation in the eastern United States”, Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, Vol. 110(D07S12), 2005, doi:10.1029/2004JD004683.

 

Khlystov, A., Stanier, C., Takahama, S., and Pandis, S.N., “Water Content of Ambient Aerosol During the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study”, Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 2005, Vol. 110, No. D7, D07S10, doi:10.1029/2004JD00465114. 

 

Khlystov, A., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J.-L., Stanier, C., Pandis, S.N., Caragaratna, M.R., Fine, P., Misra, C., Sioutas, C., “In-situ concentration of semi-volatile aerosol using water-condensation technology”, Journal of Aerosol Science, Vol. 36(7), 2005, pp. 866-880.

 

Zhou, L., Kim, E., Hopke, P.K., Stanier, C., and Pandis, S.N., “Mining Airborne Particulate Size Distribution Data by Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF)”, Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 2005, 110, D07S19, doi:10.1029/2004JD004707.

 

Donahue, N.M., Huff Hartz, K.E., Chuong, B., Presto, A., Stanier, C., Rosenhørn, T., Robinson, A.L., and Pandis, S.N., “Critical factors determining the variation in SOA yields from terpene ozonolysis: A combined experimental and computational study”, Faraday Discussions, Vol. 130, 2005, pp. 1-15.

 

Stanier, C., Khlystov, A., and Pandis, S.N. “Nucleation Events during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study: Description and Relation to Key Meteorological, Gas Phase, and Aerosol Parameters.” Aerosol Science and Technology 2004, 38(S1): 253-264.

 

Stanier, C., Khlystov, A., Chan, W.R., Mandiro, M., and Pandis, S.N. “A Method for the In-situ Measurement of Fine Aerosol Water Content of Ambient Aerosol: the Dry-Ambient Aerosol Size Spectrometer (DAASS).” Aerosol Science and Technology 2004, 38(S1): 215-228.

 

Stanier, C., Khlystov, A., and Pandis, S.N. “Ambient Aerosol Size Distributions and Particle Number Concentrations Measured during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study.” Atmospheric Environment 2004, 38: 3275-3284.

 

Khlystov, A., Stanier, C., and Pandis, S.N. “An Algorithm for Combining Electrical Mobility and Aerodynamic Size Distribution Data when Measuring Ambient Aerosol.” Aerosol Science and Technology 2004, 38(S1): 229-238.

 

Zhou, L., Kim, E., Hopke, P.K., Stanier, C., and Pandis, S.N. “Advanced Factor Analysis on Pittsburgh Particle Size Distribution Data.” Aerosol Science and Technology 2004, 38(S1): 118-132.

 

Rees, S., Robinson, A., Khlystov, A., Stanier, C., and Pandis, S.N. “Mass Balance Closure and the Federal Reference Method for PM2.5 in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania.” Atmospheric Environment 2004, 28(20): 3305-3318.

 

Zhang, Q., Stanier, C., Caragaratna, M., Jayne, J.T., Worsnop, D., Pandis, S.N., Jimenez, J.L. “Insights into the Chemistry of Nucleation Bursts and Particle Growth Events in Pittsburgh Based on Aerosol Mass Spectrometry.” Environmental Science and Technology 2004, doi:10.1021/es035417u.

 

Lipsky, E., Stanier, C., and Pandis, S.N., and Robinson, A.L. “Effects of Sampling Conditions on the Size Distribution of Fine Particulate Matter Emitted From a Pilot-Scale Pulverized-Coal Combustor.” Energy and Fuels 2002, 16(2): 302-310.

 

Updated 7/2010

The University of Iowa College of Engineering